Skip to main content
G11 SUPER GIO
123
02
PRACTICE MISSIONcredibility, synthesis, gaps, and citation

credibility, synthesis, gaps, and citation

NEW CASENEW EVIDENCE

Evaluate credibility

Article A: peer-reviewed, 12 schools, methods published. Article B: company blog selling a scheduling app, one unnamed school, no raw data. Both claim improved attention.

  1. Conflict of interest matters but does not automatically falsify.
  2. Transparent method supports evaluation.
  3. Corroborate claims.

How should the review use them?

MODELSource Conversation Map
LEAD
PROVEChoose with evidence
CLUE

Pause. Find what matters. Then make your move.